“The LORD watches over you—
the
LORD is your shade at your right hand. . .”
What he told the world is that since 1895, American news sources have alternated
warnings about our changing climate. For
almost forty years prior to the Great Depression, most opinion-makers touted
the present danger of a returning ice age.
And that’s not all.
What he said is that arch-political scientists and their friends in the
news media have beating the drum about global warming for years now, when there
is no such phenomena—or, if there is, it’s nothing more than a temporary shift,
our climate and planet far more dynamic than some would think.
What he claimed has been proved, beyond a shadow of a
doubt, is that the so-called “hockey stick,” the heavily reported spike in
climate temperatures throughout the 20th century after thousands of
years of constancy, has been proven totally false by Canadian researchers who
simply tore it apart. That spike is phony
baloney.
What he told all of us is that the National Academy of
Science has shown conclusively that humanity has suffered through minor climate
changes before, that what is called “the Medieval Warm Period” (900 A.D. to
1500 A.D.) and “the Little Ice Age” (1500 to 1850) are bona fide proof of
natural and sustainable climate variations—and that therefore the propaganda
about “global warming” today is just hype and hooey.
What he said is that the Arctic isn’t warming but
cooling. He’s reminded us all that sixty
prominent Canadian scientists sent a letter to the Canadian Prime Minister,
saying that “'Climate change is real' is a meaningless phrase used
repeatedly by activists to convince the public that a climate catastrophe is
looming and humanity is the cause. Neither of these fears is justified. Global
climate changes occur all the time due to natural causes and the human impact
still remains impossible to distinguish from this natural 'noise.'"
He
claimed that restraining so-called greenhouse gases has real economic costs,
stifling business activity and a bustling economy, and therefore hindering
progress in dealing with world poor. He
quoted this headline, "Climate Changes
Endanger World's Food Output," called alarmist and dangerous, and then pointed
out that it ran in the New York Times
in 1975, thirty years ago.
He is a senator,
and the speech he delivered, years ago already, is much longer, full of facts
and documented anecdotes and references to studies.
I have neither the time nor the competence to study the
issue of global warming thoroughly, and whether the Senator is even partially right,
scientists themselves appear to disagree.
So the nature of the question changes in my circumstance: it’s not “what do you believe about global
warming?” Instead, it’s “who do you
believe?”
And I choose not to believe the Senator. I choose to
believe instead a list as long as my arm of people who radically disagree with
his claims. I may be wrong.
But I also choose to believe the psalmist when he
says—with nary a hint of global warming—that this God of his (who’s apparently
at his right hand armed with a parasol) is watching over all of us—polar
meltdown or coming ice age, and that this God, my God, is my shade from all
kinds of heat. That truth is transcendent.
He is my
only comfort—in both deathly cold January and the dog days of mid-July. He is
my only comfort. That I know by faith.

1 comment:
Question: "What is your GREATEST comfort in life and death?
Post a Comment