“For evil men will be cut off,
but those who hope in the
LORD will inherit the land.”
I don’t know that this line sounds right out here in farm
country.
My father-in-law was what used to be called a “small
farmer,” in the days when there was such a thing. My wife grew up on a farm like Old
McDonalds—little of this, little of that.
Well, I got news.
Out here, those kinds of farms simply don’t exist anymore. Farming has become agri-business, and
everything has changed.
My father-in-law bought some land when he was farming, nowhere
near enough for a young farmer today.
But he owns the land, enough of it that my wife’s inheritance is
significant. We could come heir to it,
but then he might just give it away, to church or school.
But let’s say his land comes to us. Let’s say we keep it, and even though we
don’t live on it, we might just drive by once in a while. We’d likely rent it out to the cousin who now
farms it. Eventually, however, we’d pass land ownership on to our children.
Now there is a possibility that our children will live in
the neighborhood someday, but that certainly isn’t a given. So, it’s possible that eventually the land her
father bought as he slowly built his own farm will end up in the hands of absentee
landlords.
That phenomenon is happening all over the rural Midwest, prompting
people to ask whether so much “absentee landlordism” is going to be good for
the health of communities. That question
goes to the very heart of the quality of life out here on the far western edge
of the cornbelt. What exactly is our
future if people in faraway cities own the land we live on?
To promise, as the NIV does, that those who hope in the
Lord will inherit the land sounds, in
this region, like a pipe dream—and it is.
Good people don’t inevitably win in the quest for land ownership. The mid-80s’ “farm crisis” made that perfectly
clear. More often than not, good,
hard-working people got flattened. Sorry, David—perhaps that nay have been true in old Israel, but it’s not true—nor
should anyone promise it—in the rural areas of the Upper Midwest.
The KJV says, more metaphorically perhaps, that the
righteous will inherit the earth. In our
present context, I much prefer earth
to land. If I lived in Toronto or New York or Los Angeles,
I wouldn’t much care which word is used; but here, where the future of rural
life is dependent upon land ownership, I much prefer “the earth.”
Earth
spiritualizes richly. It suggests that
those who hope in God inherit the concept of earth; they inherit the true (which is to say, spiritual) riches of this earth, not the ground itself, not the
back forty, the neighbor’s thousand acres. Cold hard cash is not at issue here and neither is good black dirt.
Calvin says that what David means with this line is that
those who hope in the Lord “shall live in such a manner as that the blessing of
God shall follow them, even to the grave.”
That blessing may well include a thousand acres, but you can’t take that
promise to the bank.
It probably goes without saying that what David is
promising is a far better than the flattest, blackest land in all of Sioux
County, Iowa. But out here, where land ownership is so important, it probably
needs to be said.
1 comment:
Catherine the Great gave allodial titles to Mennonites and her other fellow Germans (mostly from Danzig) for providing hard tack to her armies.
These titles are displayed in a museum in Newton Kansas,
I have suggested to them (Stan and Gladys) that when Victora Newland and Zelenskyy get done huffing and puffing in Ukraine,, the holder in due coarse should appear.
What sort of land titles lured people into Iowa?
When it is considered what sort of scoundrel the Duke of York was,, am I the only one who thinks the Dutch should ask for Manhattan island back.
Romans 11:26
“And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written,
thanks,
Jerry
Post a Comment