By the time American troops got to Europe in 1917, African-Americans had an established, but not celebrated history in military service of our country. In 1862, under the direction of Thomas Wentworth Higgenson, the sworn abolitionist and literary heartthrob of young Emily Dickinson, the first federally authorized Black military unit, the First South Carolina Volunteers, went to war.
In 1863, the 54th Voluntary Massachusetts Infantry, provided a bloody frontal assault on Ft. Wagner, Charleston, West Virginia, on July 18, 1863, a story boldly told in Glory (1989), starring Denzel Washington.
When the Civil War ended, African-Americans were recruited for a unit that became known as the “Buffalo Soldiers,” a cavalry regiment based at Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas.
African-American rough-riders stormed San Juan Hill with Teddy Roosevelt, even stepped in between cattlemen and ranchers in Wyoming’s Johnson County War.
Still, by 1915 white American Doughboys weren’t taken with the Black troops, even when the two wore the same uniform. African-Americans believed their service offered a place in society otherwise flatly unachievable. Within a week of Wilson’s Declaration of War, the army stopped enlisting Black volunteers because their quota was full. Eventually, 350,000 would serve.
But racism was everywhere, as was enforced segregation. Still, by the end of the war, the armed forces offered more and varied opportunities for Black men than they would have found had they never left home. Black troops served in cavalry, infantry, signal, medical, engineer, and artillery units, as chaplains, surveyors, truck drivers, chemists, and intelligence officers. Still, often as not, white men refused to salute Black officers and many enlisted men did only the lowliest service jobs.
Before the Declaration, W. E. B DuBois, the first African-American to receive a Ph.D. from Harvard, warned Black people that the First World War wasn’t just a white man’s war. In an essay titled “White Imperialism,” DeBois called that attitude a mistake. “The present war in Europe,” he wrote, “is one of the great disasters due to race and color prejudice and it but foreshadows greater disasters in the future.”
DuBois claimed the war in France and Belgium pitted powers whose major interest was imperialism, conquering and taking control of lands and people they could exploit.
Asia, Africa, the South Sea Islands, the West Indies, Mexico and Central America and much of South America have long been designated by the white world as fit field for this kind of commercial exploitation, for the benefit of Europe and with little regard for the welfare of the natives.
That kind of exploitation is only one kind of racial “abuse.” There is another, he says. “In this way a theory of the inferiority of the darker peoples and a contempt for their rights and aspirations has become all but universal in the greatest centers of modern culture.”
That line is 104 years old. But I seem to remember a remarkable American newsmaker just recently wondering aloud why America doesn’t recruit more Norwegian immigrants. "Why are we having all these people from sh*thole countries come here?" he said. A century later, DuBois still has it right.
For the record, in two weeks of intense, hand-to-hand combat at Champagne and Monthois, the 372nd Infantry of the 93rd Regiment, all African-Americans, suffered 600 casualties. The French government awarded the entire unit the Croix de Guerre, with 43 officers, 14 noncommissioned officers, and 116 privates receiving either the Croix de Guerre or the Distinguished Service Cross. And there were many more.
On 11 November 1918 at 1100, the war ended. African American troops celebrated, I’m sure, with hugs and shouts of joy and relief. But a price was paid. 53,000 Doughboys didn’t return. The 92d Division and 93rd Divisions, both African-American, suffered more than 5000 casualties.
When they got stateside, many walked back home into a world of Jim Crow.
1 comment:
For some reason, Manfred is not very nice to the black troops sent to Europe in his Of Lizards and Angels. Could it be that he was being savvy in oder to slip the information about US troops in Siberia?
I have only known 2 writers who talked about US troops in Siberia in 1918. Manfred was one -- when he talks about Remus Baker. Antony Sutton was the other,
back in the days when John Hospers was part of Libertarian party.
Combined with the ritual murder of the Russian royal family thru US diplomatic channels --- Jacob Schiff and the New York banks --- Moscow was the branch office and New York the front office of what was called the Soviet Union.
The few Russians I have talked to over the years do not dissagree that the Soviet Union was concieved and run by the New York banks.
thanks,
Jerry
Post a Comment