“He wraps
himself in light as with a garment;
he stretches out the heavens like a tent
and lays the beams of his upper chambers on their waters.
He makes the clouds
his chariot and rides on the wings of the wind.”
Psalm 104:3
There’s
an oddly discordant shift in pronoun number in this beautiful psalm—I’m not
sure why (and I’m sounding like an English teacher). The poem begins by
addressing God face to face (“O LORD my God, you are very great; you are
clothed with splendor and majesty”), and then shifts rather inexplicably into
a third person portrait of the God the psalmist had just been addressing (“He
wraps himself. . .”). Why the change? It’s as if, in two verses, the poet is
addressing two different listeners—first, God, very much in prayer, and then
us—or at least someone other than God.
Scholars
can probably suggest an answer, but I’m wondering if the psalmist isn’t really
addressing his soul. The first line of the poem is a command, after all. The
psalmist points a finger at his own soul. “Praise the Lord, O my soul,” he
orders.
Is his
soul bored or lazy? Maybe. Some are. Mine is. Sometimes. Often maybe. More than
it should be anyway. Seems to me that souls need
to be exercised, don’t they? Get a little out of shape otherwise.
Experience
says yes—at least my experience does. Hence the words appearing from the
blinking cursor as it charges across a line on a white screen before me.
Maybe
this succession of inspiring, royal images, mythic in character and
extravagance, is a form of rhetoric designed to convince the poet’s own niggardly
soul that God is, in fact, to be praised. It’s a pep talk, an interior
monologue, a rallying cry for the soul. Perhaps these royal metaphors are more
about the psalmist than about the God he wants better to serve.
And why, after
countless mornings spent with the psalms, do I still find that possibility so
odd? Why does it feel strange to think that what’s behind the heavenly imagery
of this gorgeous psalm has more to do with a mulish soul than a mighty God? Why
should that surprise me, shock me?
In his
“Introduction to the Wisdom Books” in The
Message, Eugene Peterson says, “There is a distinctive strain of writing in
the Bible that more or less specializes in dealing with human experience—as
is,” which is to say, some biblical lit focuses on what we are: flaccid souls in
dire need of enrichment, of pep talks. “The Wisdom writers [by which he means
the writers of Jobs, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Song of Songs] keep us
honest with and attentive to the entire range of human experience that God the
Spirit uses to fashion a life of holy salvation in each of us.”
Here’s
what excites me this morning, as my fingers tap the keys: that in this
exercise—simply thinking about what the Bible says—I’m doing at least something
of what the psalmist is, that is, doing the spiritual discipline his soul appears
to require, refreshing himself—as I am and you are now--with what I can know of
the reality of God’s love in the world, a world he fashioned, and runs, and
gave us for our joy.
In the
opening chorus of Psalm 104, the blazon of royal metaphors may well teach me
more about myself than they do about God.
That’s
half-truth. In teaching us more about ourselves, this psalm—and all of
them—finally teach us more about “a life of holy salvation in each of us.”
No comments:
Post a Comment