Wednesday, June 12, 2024


Once upon a time in a tiny little Presbyterian church in a tiny little town on the prairie, two elders (there were only two) determined that that very little congregation--at best, maybe forty people, fewer present for Sunday worship--should break ties altogether with the big denomination of which they'd been a part for more than a century because their mainline mother had curtsied up, far too close, to sin and evil by tolerating--yes, that's right tolerating, homosexuals, queers, LBGTQ or whatever as members and even office-bearers of the church.

The people in this tiny Presbyterian church were good folks, all of them, but they were convinced that such abominations had no place among the righteous; and those who admitted such sinners to their fellowship were somehow disobeying the scriptural mandates which set those people apart. 

Let's be clear here--no queer people were lined up for admission to either the table or fellowship at this little church on the prairie. In other words, none of those people the little church's membership sought to banish were anywhere near that little Presbyterian church. Nonetheless, the little church's elders wanted it known far and wide that their little church would not admit such sinners. 

Because they wanted nothing to do with the liberal churches, they brought the matter to a vote to determine how many of their little number wanted to come clean and join a more conservative Presbyterian denomination.

We'd never joined the little Presbyterian church, although we often attended and enjoyed the fellowship for more than a year. It wasn't much like the denomination we'd been a part of for all of our lives, but there was something about the members' devotion to each other that we found, frankly, lovely.

But when the little church voted to leave the mother church, we left too. There were other reasons for our leaving, but this abiding sense of self-righteousness manifest in their declaring their own purity made us wince. 

In truth, we found it hard to believe that if some gay couple had determined to visit and worship with this tiny little dying church, the vast number of its members would love to have them. It's just that making the big pitch to avoid the horrors of liberalism seemed so righteous. 

So they left, and so did we.

This week's Synod of the Christian Reformed Church finds itself amidst that same dilemma. A church in a city in Michigan had a deacon--a woman--who was in a gay relationship. She was not a kid, had been a deacon before, and came to the office by vote of the congregation.

But that deacon lit a fire in a denomination full of churches not at all unlike the little Presbyterian church we attended. As a result, the denomination I've been a part of for most of my life is facing a choice between keeping gay people out and allowing them in. 

Which is only half-truth. Literally hundreds of congregations within the denomination are not about to elect gay office-bearers because they have no gay people, or at least none that have come out. 

A majority of members of the CRC want nothing to do with gay people and consider the Bible's hatred of them to be the determining factor in their exclusion. What happened in that tiny Presbyterian church is almost sure to happen in the entire CRC denomination. Some will feel blessed by barring gay people. Some will be certain of their righteousness.

Others will not. Others will leave, as we did when we left that little Presbyterian church. Some will be excluded from what the CRC comes to determine as good and true and right. 

It seems clear a majority will vote for exclusion. 

Will the denomination survive?

Time will tell.


5 comments:

  1. Anonymous7:32 PM

    The gay people have been created in God’s image. The sin is not being gay, the sin is in a lifestyle of gay relationships. Let’s face it the plumbing is not compatible.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dutchovenmt8:32 AM

    For the most part, I agree with your assessment regarding enfolding alternate lifestyle folks. In my mind the problem comes from fear...fear of unknown, understanding, and relationship; and this goes two ways. However, and this is a big point, understanding the Word and how it relates to those who question there gender assignment and how that relates to the Word. Yes it is easy to point to episodes in the Bible that condemn what would be called "God ordained physical relationships", but sin is sin if you like to identify it in that matter and there is a lot of sin to go around in a variety shapes and sizes.

    Why focus on this particular "sin" as it may? One thing, it is hard to believe is one was formed in the womb there is an optional arrangement for the equipment provided, and that sexual relationships can be adjusted at will can be reassigned at whim. However, to me the point is how we respond to God and his creation of a person who is created in his image. I don't think the whole Denomination's position is just based on "liberalism vs conservative"; that matrix shifts too often. For sure it is one of those mysteries that will only be reveled in the end of time, but this is for sure...we are responsible for our actions, all of them.

    Bottom line...show grace, live grace, and yes if that can't be done...leave. Remember though, all are responsible for there actions...lack of grace, mercy, acceptance and forgiveness- both ways, will be judged. I have many acquaintances who chose not to live as me, we all judged for what we do. End up on the side of compassion and humility and grace...even if it hurts your feelings, but trust God has all in control. You don't have to be like someone to embrace them in the love of Christ...but you need to ask a critical question; WWJD...and leave it there. Perhaps I am getting too old, life is too short to worry about somethings outside of what is our relationship to God is.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous8:55 AM

    No Jim, it is not a matter of exclusion! Wow!! they even let you in! It is a matter of recognizing and acknowledging sin as defined by scripture. Gay, queers,lesbians and transgenderism are welcome to the inclusion providing they do not teach and promote their sin.

    ReplyDelete
  4. How can it be that gay people should not teach and promote their "sin" but the rest of us don't have to somehow pass that same test? At least no one seems to be tracking our sins that carefully.

    And gay people are not questioning their gender assignment. This is what they were assigned from birth and it is a matter of realizing the truth of who they are. One does NOT choose to be gay.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous8:25 PM

    I Corinthians 6
    9 Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men[a] 10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

    "11 And that is what some of you were..." Past tense... "were" NOT are. Better Together only after they "... were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God." No Third Way, Jesus Christ is the only "Way, the Truth, and the Life."

    ReplyDelete