.jpg)
A Year of Morning Thanks
Counting coup/counting bucks
In a book titled Radical Hope: Ethics in the Face of Cultural Devastation, Jonathan Lear explains exactly what the death of a culture means to a people. He begins by quoting a memoir by the Crow chief Plenty Coups, who was talking to a biographer. "I can think back and tell you much more of war and horse-stealing. But when the buffalo went away the hearts of my people fell to the ground, and they could not lift them again. After this, nothing happened."
"Nothing happened."
Lear speculates that what Plenty Coups meant by that haunting line is that, for him at least, the demise of his traditional Crow culture was, in a way, the end of history. Plenty Coups did indeed have a life after that moment, but the biographer, Frank B. Linderman, a trapper, hunter, and cowboy, who lived close to the Crows in Montana, claims that at that point, the story Plenty Coups was telling him simply ended: "Linderman says he was unable to get Plenty Coups to talk about anything that happened after the Crow were confined to a reservation." It was as if life stopped, even though it hadn’t.
What Lear does is try understand what that line meant, not by digging more deeply into the biography of Plenty Coups or even studying American history, but by thinking through the death of a culture.
Central to his investigation is the Crow tradition of "counting coups," a tradition in the warrior society that became the means by which young men attained stature and station. The coup stick had at least two purposes in Crow society. First, when planted in the ground, coup stick demarcated an area, a line-in-the-sand, from which the warrior could not—at any cost, even his life—retreat; second, it was the weapon by which "counting coup" was accomplished, an assortment of behaviors by which the warrior touched or stung or hit the enemy first, without being similarly struck himself. These events became the stuff of stories at night, when the hostilities ceased. More importantly, they became the means by which men measured their daring, their courage, and, in a very moral way, their value to the community.
Lear does Anglo reader invaluable service by opening up the rituals that surrounded use of coup sticks so to understand the behavior of the warriors, not simply as violent acts, but the means by which value is adduced and attributed within the culture. Counting coup is not simply recreational or even simply an indicator of battle prowess. Counting Coup, he shows, was the means by which morality was the means by which morality was measured and defined in the society.
Life on the reservation meant an end to the institutional violence which characterized Crow and other Plains Indian cultures. Suddenly, the coup stick, which was, in many ways, the measuring stick for moral behavior and moral character, had no meaning whatsoever. In short, Lear says, with an end to traditional life among the Crow, "The planting of the coup stick has ceased to be an intelligible act—in the sense that there are no longer viable ways of doing it. The only ways of living forward with it are retrospective: one can remember it, recount its history, dramatize it at a powwow, mourn its loss. But as things now stand, there is nowhere to plant it. Without living possibilities, it can no longer live as a coup-stick."
No one has made more clear to me that meaning often attributed to the entire march of Anglo people westward than Lear has in his book. If any society loses its central measurement for morality--both personal and communal--that society loses, in essence, its very culture.
For months since I first read Lear's book, I've tried to find the correct analogy to American society. For a time, I thought it would be the Bible--and it very well might be for some Americans, those, like me, who believe in the eternal value of the Word. For others, perhaps it would be sports--professional athletes earning higher salaries than most of the highest ranking CEOs.
This week, while traveling through Lakota country, we were talking about that idea when my colleague quickly and easily pointed out that the analogy I was looking for, really, was nothing more or less than the almighty dollar.
The dollar--more than the Bible or sports or celebrity--is the currency of our own moral exchange. What we value and how we value it is a function of our economics. Maybe Marx wasn't wrong.
So here's how I'm thinking this through: if we were suddenly to lose our currency, our culture, as we know it at least, would die. And we white folks would flounder. After hundreds of years of living with the dollar as the center of our consciousness, it would undoubtedly take some time for us to determine how on earth we should live.
So this morning, after several days in Crazy Horse country, far from any internet connection, I'm thankful for my colleague's help in thinking this through, thankful that today I understand myself, my world, and my values--as well the story of Native life--at least a little bit better.