Morning Thanks

Garrison Keillor once said we'd all be better off if we all started the day by giving thanks for just one thing. I'll try.

Friday, November 09, 2007


Saint


Here's a story. I was here 25 years ago to do a couple of stories about people from the neighborhood; one of them was supposed to be Navajo or Zuni. I was doing a book for the denomination of which I am a part, the Christian Reformed Church, and part of the contract dictated that I travel here, to New Mexico, and tell an authentic Indian story.


I contacted the man I was told was the patriarch of the place at the time--a man named Rev. Rolf Veenstra, a man who gave himself to the mission that he served here, a mission that was, at the time, already 75 years old.


Veenstra told me he wouldn't set me up with some local Indian because whenever church bureacrats came down to New Mexico, he said, they always wanted to meet some Tonto to feed their own PR urges--or whatever. "The future of the Native American," he told me, "isn't on reservations. The future of Native America is elsewhere."


I understood that assertion, although not as well as he did. I didn't argue--he knew better than I could have. Instead, I found a Native woman in Chicago, at a CRC Inidian mission. She was from Arizona, I remember, but her story was wonderful. I wonder where she is today--or her children, who played beside her when I did the interview. In retrospect, I think Veenstra was right in chasing me away.


But that declaration of his stays with me, a quarter century later. I've asked Red Lake Ojibwas, some Lummis from northwest Washington, Lakotas from Rosebud, and a Navajo from Arizona that question--is the future of Native people truly off-reservation? Today, they all say the same thing: Native people must have reservations--reservations are home.


But should they leave, as Veenstra declared? The answers to that question are mixed, more by predilection than tribe.


I don't claim to know that answer--and this white guy certainly wouldn't try to answer for Natives. But I think he was wrong for being that vehement because I think the answer is more nuanced. What's happened since the late 70s is a nativistic resurgence, a renaissance of traditional values, a return--or at least an attempt--to find at least something of "the old ways." A Lummi leader told me that he believed in just five years, Lummi kids would be speaking the old language today.


Here, at the mission school where my church has been for more than 100 years, the Navajo Nation's Education Committee will get a tour of the brand new facilities today. One part of the tour will be a showcase of the Code Talkers Center in the Middle School. While they're there, those bureaucrats will hear little Navajo kids speaking Navajo--they're learning it here, a place where the Navajo language was once thought to be a token of a way of life that had to be abandoned by way of a theory that went like this: Native people had to learn to get along in the real world--which was, of course, white.


I saw his grave yesterday--Rev. Rolf Veenstra. He was a wonderful pastor, a leader, a man given to love and compassion. The stone calls him a Saint. I don't know if he would have chosen that word himself, but it was clear even then--25 years ago--that people respected him as a tower of faith and grace.


I think he was a saint, quite frankly, but the whole story is proof that even our best isn't always all right.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I happened upon your blog quite innocently after my son googled his grandfather's name. I was gratified to see you writing about my father, someone very well respected in his day and held in high esteem. It's hard to understand what my dad was talking about with regards to "the future of Native Americans not being on the reservation" from the context given. I know he said often that the role of evangelism among a "native people" should be done by the natives themselves, and not someone who doesn't understand the culture as fully as someone who grew up in it. Perhaps that is why he was discouraging to you. Regardless, I'm sure he would be the first to say that he wasn't always right. However, as to not calling himself "a saint", he was the one that popularized that phrase for us commoners, going so far as to having address labels made for family members headlined "Saint Veenstra".

Anonymous said...

I have found a copy of "The Secrets of Suffering" that was signed by Rev. Veenstra and A note sent to my mother-in-law in 1989 from him. i am interested in learning more about him. Can you suggest any resources?

Please post an answer to your blog if you receive this.

Thank You